<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Windows Perl Scripting Forums &#187; Topic: Win32::Daemon woes</title>
<link>http://www.roth.net/forums/</link>
<description>Windows Perl Scripting Forums &#187; Topic: Win32::Daemon woes</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:22:37 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Dave on "Win32::Daemon woes"</title>
<link>http://www.roth.net/forums/topic.php?id=174#post-414</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">414@http://www.roth.net/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;JOE!!!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It &#60;em&#62;has&#60;/em&#62; been a long time. I&#38;#39;m doing well; working extremely hard! I trust you&#38;#39;re doing well too. :)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I was going to ask about the R: drive. It is possible to run the service under a user account that does have such permissions. Additionally if you were to use a UNC (&#60;a href=&#34;//server/share/&#34;&#62;\\server\share\&#60;/a&#62;...) you could configure the remote share to allow &#60;em&#62;any&#60;/em&#62; connection from your particular computer. That would allow access from any account on the scripted machine; including localhost accounts.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I&#38;#39;m glad that you were able to resolve the issue. Feel free to stop by more often! :)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Peace&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>JoeCasadonte on "Win32::Daemon woes"</title>
<link>http://www.roth.net/forums/topic.php?id=174#post-404</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>JoeCasadonte</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">404@http://www.roth.net/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Answering one&#38;#39;s own question is oft considered bad form, but I&#38;#39;ll do it anyway.&#38;nbsp; Thinking about this on the way home last night, it occurred to me that I could wrap the &#60;strong&#62;use&#60;/strong&#62; in an eval and trap the error.&#38;nbsp; So I did.&#38;nbsp; As expected, the script was not compiling, dieing on the &#60;strong&#62;use&#60;/strong&#62; statement.&#38;nbsp; I check the spelling and the paths; everything looked fine.&#38;nbsp; And then it came to me: my R: drive is a network resource, and the service doesn&#38;#39;t know jack about it!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Sometimes it&#38;#39;s the simple things.....&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>JoeCasadonte on "Win32::Daemon woes"</title>
<link>http://www.roth.net/forums/topic.php?id=174#post-402</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>JoeCasadonte</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">402@http://www.roth.net/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Dave!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Been a long time; hope you&#38;#39;re well!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I&#38;#39;ve been beating my head against the wall for 3 days now trying to get my app to work as a daemon. &#38;nbsp; I&#38;#39;ve combed the forums trying to find an answer to no avail.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;ul&#62;
&#60;li&#62;OS: WinXP Pro&#60;/li&#62;
&#60;li&#62;Perl: This is perl, v5.8.7&#60;/li&#62;
&#60;li&#62;Win32::Daemon: initially 2003.06.17, currently 2002.06.06&#60;/li&#62;
&#60;/ul&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I can get things installed correctly, and get a simple script to run.&#38;nbsp; The minute I try and use one of my own modules, though, it stops working.&#38;nbsp; As near as I can tell, it&#38;#39;s not compiling (the first thing I do is try to open a log file to output debug statements, and I see nothing).&#38;nbsp; Of course, it compiles fine if run from the command line.&#38;nbsp; I have a &#60;code&#62;&#60;strong&#62;use lib &#38;quot;r:/&#38;quot;;&#60;/strong&#62; &#60;/code&#62; statement in there, so I know that the paths are correct and not depending on a particular working directory.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Any ideas how I can figure out what&#38;#39;s going wrong?&#38;nbsp; I&#38;#39;m going batty trying to figure it out!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;joe&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;edit: evidently this is not a FireFox-friendly editing box.....&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
