<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Windows Perl Blog &#187; Perl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/category/perl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roth.net/blog</link>
	<description>Helping the Perl world cope with Windows</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft ASP.NET Chart Control and the Macintosh</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2010/07/04/microsoft-asp-net-chart-control-and-the-macintosh/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=microsoft-asp-net-chart-control-and-the-macintosh</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2010/07/04/microsoft-asp-net-chart-control-and-the-macintosh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 07:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2010/07/04/microsoft-asp.net-chart-control-and-the-macintosh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#1050;&#1072;&#1088;&#1090;&#1080;&#1085;&#1080;&#1080;&#1082;&#1086;&#1085;&#1080;&#1090;&#1088;&#1072;&#1087;&#1077;&#1079;&#1085;&#1080; &#1084;&#1072;&#1089;&#1080;Recently I have been using ASP.NET on our servers to manage internal processes. As part of this effort I needed to chart out certain process values. To accomodate this I decided to use Microsoft&#8217;s charting controls. These controls are pretty nice. They offer nearly the same charting options as you would expect from Excel; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2010/07/04/microsoft-asp-net-chart-control-and-the-macintosh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista and User Virtualization</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/vista-and-user-virtualization/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=vista-and-user-virtualization</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/vista-and-user-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 06:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annoyances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/vista-and-user-virtualization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Along with Vista&#8217;s UAC security infrastructure Microsoft implemented something very clever, but has caused administrators and Perl coders frustration: User File and Registry Virtualization. The concept of UAC (http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/vista-and-user-account-control-uac/) Â is useful since it places finer control over what non-administrators can and cannot do. One of the core tenets of UAC is that a non-administrator should [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/vista-and-user-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista and User Account Control (UAC)</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/vista-and-user-account-control-uac/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=vista-and-user-account-control-uac</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/vista-and-user-account-control-uac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 04:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annoyances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/vista-and-user-account-control-uac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say what you will about Windows Vista but don&#8217;t think that it isn&#8217;t a big deal. Regardless of how you may feel about Microsoft, they put a lot of work into the Vista operating system. Sure the UI may not be as snazzy as Apple&#8217;s OS X and it is barren of some features from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/vista-and-user-account-control-uac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perl users driving in Seattle</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/10/20/perl-users-driving-in-seattle/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=perl-users-driving-in-seattle</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/10/20/perl-users-driving-in-seattle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 05:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/10/20/perl-users-driving-in-seattle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the &#34;Seattle Drivers Suck&#34; blog (link) I am finally seeing those of us&#160;Seattle drivers&#160;(both Perl and non Perl drivers) vent and rant about what they loathe about the average Seattle driver. This is good reading for anyone considering visiting this town, and manditory for everyone moving here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/10/20/perl-users-driving-in-seattle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ActiveState&#8217;s Win32 Perl and Cryptography (or lack thereof)</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/09/29/activestates-win32-perl-and-cryptography-or-lack-thereof/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=activestates-win32-perl-and-cryptography-or-lack-thereof</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/09/29/activestates-win32-perl-and-cryptography-or-lack-thereof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annoyances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/09/29/activestates-win32-perl-and-cryptography-or-lack-thereof/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over in the RC forums (http://www.roth.net/forums/) someone posted about having problems with Crypt::SSLeay on a Windows server. Of course I was curious so I started digging and uncovered an interesting blog entry from Brian Kelly over at SQLServerCentral.com. He explains why ActiveState does not offer the standard encryption extensions either by default or in their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/09/29/activestates-win32-perl-and-cryptography-or-lack-thereof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Win32::TieRegistry and Permissions</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/09/27/win32tieregistry-and-permissions/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=win32tieregistry-and-permissions</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/09/27/win32tieregistry-and-permissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annoyances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/09/27/win32tieregistry-and-permissions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My tech editor recently pointed out something that I found quite astonishing about the Win32::TieRegistry. If you are not familiar with this extension, it is quite useful: by tie-ing a hash to the Windows registry it is quite simple and easy to access registry hives, keys, values and data&#8211;as easy as using a simple Perl [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/09/27/win32tieregistry-and-permissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why don&#8217;t people use precompiled regular expressions?</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/07/25/why-dont-people-use-precompiled-regular-expressions/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=why-dont-people-use-precompiled-regular-expressions</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/07/25/why-dont-people-use-precompiled-regular-expressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/07/25/why-dont-people-use-precompiled-regular-expressions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time ago a friend introduced me to precompiled regular expressions. Now, I have always been an absolute fan of regex&#8211;it is one of the cornerstones of Perl. I have written scripts that consisted of hundreds of regexes. But since my introduction to the precompiled regex I am a full time advocate! The beauty of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/07/25/why-dont-people-use-precompiled-regular-expressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using COM objects in Perl</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/07/04/using-com-objects-in-perl/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=using-com-objects-in-perl</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/07/04/using-com-objects-in-perl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/07/04/using-com-objects-in-perl/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over in the Forums (http://www.roth.net/forums) a question was asked about converting VBScript into Perl. This reminded me of a question that I am still frequently asked about: how do you use COM objects in Perl? It just so happens that we have a PowerPoint presentation that I gave at the 2000 Perl Conference on this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/07/04/using-com-objects-in-perl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Win32 Perl Annoyance: Lack of PATH traversal</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/06/27/win32-perl-annoyance-lack-of-path-traversal/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=win32-perl-annoyance-lack-of-path-traversal</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/06/27/win32-perl-annoyance-lack-of-path-traversal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annoyances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/06/27/win32-perl-annoyance-lack-of-path-traversal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the annoyances that Win32 Perl bothers me with is the lack of traversing the PATH. There are some&#160;Win32 specific functions built in such as Win32::GetFullPathName() and Win32::ExpandEnvironmentStrings() which are very useful when dealing with Windows&#8217; paths, but suck when dealing with a PATH relative file.For example, if you have a path like &#34;rundll32.exe&#34; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/06/27/win32-perl-annoyance-lack-of-path-traversal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Roth Consulting Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/06/16/new-roth-conulting-forums/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-roth-conulting-forums</link>
		<comments>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/06/16/new-roth-conulting-forums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Perl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/06/16/new-roth-conulting-forums/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have redesigned our site a tad bit by adding forums. It is a place for open conversation and discussions. You can post thoughts, start threads, expose conspiracies, float new ideas&#8230;do what comes naturally in a forum! :) Unfortunately registering for the Blog does not register you for the Forums&#8211;you&#8217;ll need to register twice. Once [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roth.net/blog/index.php/2006/06/16/new-roth-conulting-forums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

